Infundly Weekly Briefing — Week Ending 17th July 2026
- Sheridan Admans
- Jul 17
- 4 min read
This week's reading is less about markets and more about the quality of governance behind investment decisions. The common thread is that robust fund selection increasingly depends on understanding how managers are structured, governed and controlled, not simply how portfolios have performed. Alongside this, the Value for Money debate continues to reinforce that fees should be assessed in the context of outcomes and the quality of the investment proposition, rather than cost alone.
What changed: The FCA has set out proposals to reform regulation of alternative investment fund managers, covering a UK industry overseeing nearly £2 trillion in alternative assets. The direction is toward a more proportionate regime while retaining controls appropriate to private equity, hedge funds, private credit and real assets.
Worth reading because: Beyond compliance, any change to thresholds, governance, delegation or reporting should alter the questions selectors ask about regulatory permissions, substance, valuation oversight, liquidity management and the division of responsibility between the manager, AIFM and service providers.
What changed: Updated proposals published on 13 July seek to move workplace pensions away from an excessive focus on headline cost and towards broader assessment of investment performance, service quality and member outcomes.
Worth reading because: The framework has wider relevance for fund governance. It supports assessing fees in relation to the quality and durability of the investment proposition rather than treating the cheapest strategy as automatically preferable. It also reinforces the need for consistent peer groups, appropriate time horizons and clear evidence for retaining an underperforming manager.
What changed: The 2026 Asset Manager Peer Study argues that managers increasingly influence the investment system itself, not merely the performance of individual portfolios, and should therefore consider systemic risks, market structure and long-term ecosystem effects.
Worth reading because: This is a useful challenge to narrow manager assessment. It suggests due diligence should test whether stewardship, capital allocation, liquidity provision and organisational incentives are genuinely connected to the manager’s investment philosophy, or remain largely separate corporate narratives.
What changed: The BIS highlights a tightening relationship between stretched public finances, sovereign-bond markets and non-bank financial institutions. It is particularly concerned about leveraged participation in government debt and the possibility that market dysfunction amplifies fiscal stress.
Worth reading because: Sovereign bonds should no longer be treated simply as a stable portfolio anchor. For fixed-income manager research, the paper sharpens questions around liquidity assumptions, leverage, derivatives, collateral management, concentration in crowded trades and how portfolios might behave during disorderly yield moves.
What changed: This July paper proposes a layered control framework for generative and agentic AI used in regulated financial workflows, addressing systems that may sit outside traditional model-risk definitions but still affect analysis, documentation, monitoring and decisions.
Worth reading because: It translates directly to AI-supported investment research. The useful elements are evidence traceability, human review, defined ownership, materiality assessment, output monitoring and escalation controls. These are increasingly necessary when assessing both managers’ AI use and allocator-side research tools.
Infundly takeaway
The strongest theme this week is governance and decision quality. The FCA's proposed reforms to the UK AIFM regime reinforce the importance of understanding the operational and governance framework supporting alternative investment managers, while the revised Value for Money proposals continue to shift attention away from headline fees towards investment outcomes and the quality of the overall proposition.
Alongside this, the growing use of generative AI in financial institutions highlights the need for stronger governance over research processes themselves. For professional fund selectors, the implication is increasingly clear: due diligence should assess not only the investment philosophy and portfolio construction, but also the governance, controls and evidence that underpin both the manager's investment process and the research used to evaluate it.
Important information
This material is intended for professional advisers, regulated firms, discretionary managers, institutional investors and other professional investment decision-makers. It is not intended for retail clients and should not be relied upon by retail investors.
This material is provided for informational and professional research purposes only. It reflects general market observations and Infundly’s analysis at the time of writing, unless otherwise stated. It does not constitute investment advice, a personal recommendation, investment management, arranging activity, or an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity.
Infundly is a trading name of AdmansPraxis Limited. Infundly is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and does not provide personal financial advice.
References to individual funds explain their characteristics and the questions they raise for professional due diligence. Inclusion within the Fund Discovery process does not constitute a recommendation, product endorsement or conclusion that a fund is appropriate for any portfolio. Regulated firms and professional users remain responsible for their own research, due diligence, product approval, suitability assessments and client outcomes.
The views, figures and data included are based on information available at the time of writing and sources believed to be reliable, but their accuracy, completeness and timeliness are not guaranteed. Markets, funds, personnel and circumstances can change without notice. The value of investments may fall as well as rise and capital is at risk. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
Third-party links and external material are provided for professional reference and convenience only. Their inclusion does not constitute endorsement by Infundly. This material must not be copied, redistributed or made available to retail clients without Infundly’s prior permission and, where appropriate, review and approval by the regulated firm responsible for the communication.
