top of page

Infundly Research

Independent fund research for fund selectors and allocators

Independent

No product bias.

No third-party influence.

No incentive to manufacture conviction where it does not exist.

Judgement-led

Evidence, experience and critical challenge.

​Analysis focused on strategy edge.

​

Structured

A consistent framework across every fund.

Focus on governance quality, portfolio role and risk.

Professional

Built for selectors, allocators and committees

Evidence, experience and critical challenge.

Clear portfolio role. Explicit risks. Independent thinking.

ChatGPT Image Jun 16, 2026, 05_05_08 PM.png

From research... to your own due diligence

Turn fund documents into a structured committee-ready draft.

Infundly Research gives investment teams independent research and conviction views.

The Committee Note Builder goes a step further. 

Document control

Evidence mapping

Research gaps

Follow-up questions

Committee discussion points

Governance & risk insights

Public-source screening

Committee-ready first draft

Two different ways to use Infundly

Infundly Rated Research

Read our independent research

Research written by Infundly

Free (approved login required)

Supports fund discovery

&

Committee Note Builder

Analyse your own funds

Research draft created from your uploaded documents

Annual firm subscription

Supports committee preparation

Our research helps you shortlist faster, challenge more effectively and make better decisions at every stage of the investment process.

How to access Infundly Research & the Committee Note Builder

A simple journey for selectors and allocators

Start here: Independent Fund Research

Explore Infundly's research proposition, sample outputs and methodology

Apply for approved login

Professional-use access chack.

Research is free

Approved login required

Browse Infundly research notes

Annual firm plan required

Upload fund documents

Generate a structured committee-ready draft

Plan & Pricing

Choose the annual plan that unlocks the tool.

Use the tool

Document-control checks

Evidence mapping

Research gaps & follow-up questions

Committee-ready output

Our fund assessment framework

The Infundly Rated Research Conviction Designations framework

Infundly Rated is awarded to selected funds, investment trusts and index strategies that meet our research standards across the Four Pillars. It reflects a positive professional research judgement at the time of review.
 

Every approved strategy receives the same Infundly Rated designation. Within our research, Emerging, Conviction and Established provide additional context about the nature, maturity and durability of the supporting evidence. They help professional users navigate Fund Discovery; they are not separate grades of commercial badge.

Active fund framework

Active strategies are assessed across philosophy and edge, process and implementation, people and governance, and evidence of behaviour through different market conditions.

Tracker fund framework

Tracker strategies are assessed across exposure integrity, index design, replication and implementation, provider governance, cost discipline and tracking delivery.

Use the Infundly evidence-profile filter to explore Emerging, Conviction and Established strategies. Every fund shown with one of these profiles has met the same Infundly Rated research standard. The profile provides context on the supporting evidence; it is not a recommendation or a ranking of expected returns.

Infundly-Rated-Badge-Transparent.png
Established fund rating within Infundly research framework
ChatGPT Image Sep 23, 2026, 04_52_41 PM.png
Emerging fund rating within Infundly research framework
What Infundly Rated represents
  • The strategy has been assessed through Infundly's independent Four Pillars research framework.

  • Infundly has formed a positive view of the investment proposition, implementation, people, governance and supporting evidence.

  • The published research explains the strategy's potential edge, portfolio role, material risks and the evidence that could change our view.

  • The designation and evidence profile remain subject to ongoing monitoring and review.

Established III

​

A positive research view supported by a deeper and more durable body of evidence, including greater opportunity to observe the strategy, team and process across relevant market conditions.

Conviction II

​

A clear positive research view supported by sufficient evidence across the Four Pillars, including the investment edge, implementation, people, governance and observed behaviour.

Emerging I

​

A positive research view where the strategy has credible foundations and merits attention, but some elements of the evidence are still developing.

How time and market cycles are considered

Track-record length is an important input, but it is not an automatic promotion mechanism. Relevant market conditions and the time needed to observe them can differ materially between asset classes, investment styles and strategy types. A fixed three-, five- or ten-year rule could therefore create false precision. 

 

Infundly considers the quality and relevance of the available evidence, the continuity of the people and process, the conditions through which the strategy has been observed and any material changes that may strengthen or weaken the original case. A profile may be reaffirmed, changed, suspended or withdrawn following review.

Discuss independent fund research support

If your team would value independent, research-grounded support on fund selection, portfolio role, manager due diligence or investment oversight, Infundly would be pleased to discuss how we can help.

Infundly Research is intended for authorised investment professionals and firms. It is not investment advice, a personal recommendation or a financial promotion to retail investors.

bottom of page